EVALUATING THE RELIABILITY LEVEL OF THE 'PENDEKAR DEWA' COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM BASED ON BENEFICIARY PERCEPTIONS

Authors

  • Isa Elfianto Prospect Institute
  • Dyah Putri Utami Prospect Institute
  • Karina Sindy Hapsari Prospect Institute
  • Mohamad Adli Community Development Officer, PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk Stasiun Pagardewa, Muara Enim, Sumatra Selatan
  • Esa Jati Manunggal Sukma Adhi Community Development Officer, PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk Stasiun Pagardewa, Muara Enim, Sumatra Selatan
  • Mhd. Khadafi Ardika Panjaitan Community Development Officer, PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk Stasiun Pagardewa, Muara Enim, Sumatra Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33884/psnistek.v8i1.11754

Keywords:

Beneficiary Perception, Community Empowerment, Corporate Social Responsibility, Program Evaluation, Program Reliability

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility programs oriented toward community empowerment require evaluation to ensure that their implementation is carried out consistently and aligns with the needs of beneficiaries. One important aspect that needs to be assessed is program reliability in delivering services, providing assistance, and implementing activities in accordance with established objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the Pendekar Dewa Program implemented by PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk Pagardewa Station based on beneficiaries’ perceptions. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed using a survey method involving 52 program beneficiaries selected through incidental sampling. Data were collected through a questionnaire measuring four reliability indicators, namely the accessibility of program requirements, the conformity of program implementation with the planned schedule, the alignment of the program with its objectives, and the regularity of field facilitators in monitoring program progress. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to obtain mean scores and the program reliability index. The results showed that all indicators were rated in the very good category. The regularity of field facilitators in monitoring program progress achieved the highest mean score, whereas the conformity of program implementation with the planned schedule obtained the lowest score, although it remained within the very good category. Overall, the Pendekar Dewa Program achieved a reliability index score of 88.75, indicating a very good level of reliability. These findings indicate that the program is implemented consistently, aligns with its intended objectives, and is capable of meeting beneficiaries’ expectations, although scheduling aspects still require further attention to improve the quality of program implementation in the future.

References

Adi, I. R. (2018). Intervensi Komunitas & Pengembangan Masyarakat sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Rajawali Pers.

Adli, M., Passabena, M. N., Amrullah, R. A., Elfianto, I., Jamal, H., Junita, F. S., ... & Azzahra, A. M. (2024). Evaluation of CSR Program Performance through Measuring Community Satisfaction at PT Pertamina Gas Negara, Tbk–Stasiun Kompresor Gas Pagardewa. Indonesian Journal of Social Responsibility Review (IJSRR), 3(2).

Azwar, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bornstein, M. H., Jager, J., & Putnick, D. L. (2013). Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Developmental Review, 33(4), 357-370.

Effendi, S., & Tukiran. (2014). Metode Penelitian Survei (Edisi Revisi). LP3ES.

Elfianto, I., & Sya'roni, I. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mitra Penerima Manfaat Terhadap Pelayanan Rumah Bumn Dumai. Prosiding SNasPPM, 6(1), 800-806.

Fatkhullah, M., Robbiy, S. R., & Mulyani, I. (2023). Community Satisfaction Analysis towards Corporate Social Responsibility Program of PT Kilang Pertamina Internasional Dumai Unit. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 275–289.

Hulgård, L. (2010). Discourses of Social Entrepreneurship – Variations of the Same Theme. EMES European Research Network Working Papers, no. 10/02.

Ife, J., & Tesoriero, F. (2008). Community Development: Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Mardikanto, T., & Soebiato, P. (2019). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Publik. Alfabeta.

Mills, G. E. & Gay, L. R.(2016).Educational Research, Competencies for Analysis and Application. Pearson Education.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Pemerintah Indonesia, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup/Badan Pengendalian Lingkungan Hidup. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup/Badan Pengendalian Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 7 Tahun 2025 tentang Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 643.

Purwanto, W., Mashitohiyah, N., & Ar-rosyid, F. S. (2025). Evaluation of a Community Social Responsibility (CSR) Program Based on a Community Satisfaction Index: A Case Study of the Kasih Bumi and Ruang Tumbuh Kalisogo Programs at PT Perusahaan Gas Negara OMM Region III. Indonesian Journal of Social Responsibility Review (IJSRR), 4(1).

Putra, A. T. A. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif (Teoretis & Praktis). Amerta Media.

Rahmadani, R., Raharjo, S. T., & Resnawaty, R. (2018). Fungsi corporate social responsibility (CSR) dalam pengembangan dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Share: Social Work Journal, 8(2), 203–210.

Rudito, B., Famiola, M., & Anggahegari, P. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Capital: Journey of Community Engagement toward Community Empowerment Program in Developing Country. Sustainability, 15(1), 466.

Setiawan, I. D. A., Devriany, A., Huda, N., Rahmadiliyanti, N., Patriyani, R. E. H., & Sulustyowati, E. C. (2021). Buku Ajar Statistika. Penerbit Adab.

Sintiya, A., Simargolang, M. Y., & Tarigan, M. F. A. (2026). Measuring service quality gaps in village administration: A SERVQUAL-based approach to community satisfaction assessment. Bigint Computing Journal, 4(1), 15–22.

Soehartono, I. (1995). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Suatu Teknik Penelitian Bidang Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 24.

Suharto, E. (2014). Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat: Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. Refika Aditama.

Untung, H. B. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility. Sinar Grafika.

Published

2026-07-18

How to Cite

Elfianto, I. ., Utami, D. P. ., Hapsari, K. S., Adli, M., Adhi, E. J. M. S. ., & Panjaitan, M. K. A. . (2026). EVALUATING THE RELIABILITY LEVEL OF THE ’PENDEKAR DEWA’ COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM BASED ON BENEFICIARY PERCEPTIONS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Sosial Dan Teknologi (SNISTEK), 8(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.33884/psnistek.v8i1.11754

Issue

Section

Articles