ANALISIS PERBEDAAN PENGUKURAN BERAT BATUBARA PADA SISTEM BELT WEIGHER DI AREA JETTY PT MERAK ENERGI INDONESIA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE KAIZEN

Authors

  • Arif Budi Sulistyo Sulistyo Universitas Banten Jaya
  • Fikri Sofiyulloh Universitas Banten Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33884/jrsi.v8i1.6387

Keywords:

Kaizen, belt weigher, Load Cell

Abstract

The need for electrical energy is very important in all human life to improve life. One of the needs that cannot be separated from human life today is the need for electrical energy. This study was conducted on the difference in coal weight measurements on belt weigher 01 and belt weigher 02 in the JETTY Area of PT Merak Energi Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to find out the difference in coal weight measurements on belt weigher 01 and belt weigher 02 in the jetty area. The collected data is then analyzed using the kaizen method with data collection, theme determination, target determination, problem cause analysis, root cause analysis, improvement plan, improvement implementation and evaluation of results. From the results of the application of kaizen to reduce the difference in the tonnage of belt weigher 01 and belt weigher 02 with the results of this draft survey, there is no such thing, because the trial of this application was carried out for 1 year. Based on the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that the difference in coal measurements occurs in Belt weighter 01 which is often the stability of the flow rate so that the results of coal unloading from barges at coal yards are different from draft surveys. The cause of the difference between Belt Weigher 01 and belt weigher 02 is because the load cell is damaged and the speed sensor is stuck so that the flow rate calculation does not match the settings that have been determined with the results of the integrator. In handling these Belt weigher tools, it uses calibration and periodic checks on the load cell and speed sensor that are stuck due to dirty because employees are not often cleaned

References

Arisandy, A. A., Nugroho, W., & Winaswangusti, A. U. (2017). Peningkatan Kualitas Batubara Sub Bituminous Menggunakan Minyak Residu Di PT. X Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur (Upgrading The Quality of Sub Bituminous Coal by Using Recycle Oil at PT. X Samarinda, East Kalimantan Province). Jurnal Teknologi Mineral FT UNMUL, 5(1), 1–6.

Irfan, I., Cahyanto, D., & Sujianto, T. (2019). Studi Kinerja Belt Scale Pada Proses Pemuatan Batubara. In Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operation Management (Vol. 2, Issue 1).

Kregel, I. (2019). Kaizen in university teaching: continuous course improvement. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(4), 975–991. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-08-2018-0090

Krisnaningsih, E., Sulistyo, A. B., Rahim, A., & Dwiyatno, S. (2022). Fuzzy risk priority number assessment to detect midsole product defects. Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industr, 6(1), 77–88.

Otsuka, K., & Sonobe, K. J. T. (2018). Applying the Kaizen in Africa. In Applying the Kaizen in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91400-8

Priskila, Kendek, A. E., & Bahrun. (2017). Rancang Bangun Timbangan Digital Dengan Kapasitas 20Kg Berbasis Microcontroller Atmega8535. Jurnal Teknik Elektro Dan Komputer, 6(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.35793/jtek.6.1.2017.16123

PT. Merak Energi Indonesia. (2017). Bab i pendahuluan 1.1. 1–30.

Renaldi, I., Dyah Juniarti, A., & Sulistyo, A. B. (2018). Analisa Kualitas Cooling Water Pada Cooling Water System Di Butadiene Plant Pt Xyz Dengan Metode Six Sigma Dan Pdca. Jurnal InTent, 1(1), 45–57.

Sulistyo, A. B., & Rinaldi, A. (2020). Pemilihan Komposisi Batubara GC-8 Atau SMM Untuk Mendapatkan Kualitas Dan Biaya Produksi Yang Optimum Di PT. Vinysea. InTent, 3(2), 52–66.

Tri, D., Rakhmanita, A., & Anggraini, A. (2019). Implementasi Kaizen Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Tangerang. Jurnal Ecodemica: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Bisnis, 3(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.31311/jeco.v3i2.6077

Zuniawan, A., & Sriwana, I. K. (2019). Handling Of Coal Dust At Coal Handling Facility In Coal Power Plant Using Soft System Methodology (SSM) Approach. 23(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2019.3.006

Published

2022-11-30