THE UTILIZATION OF SPEECH ACTS AS A TOOL OF POWER: A CASE STUDY OF MIRANDA PRIESTLY IN “THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA”

Authors

  • Mutmainna Rama Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • La Sunra State University of Makassar image/svg+xml
  • Harnita Rosalia State University of Makassar image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33884/zp300p81

Keywords:

power, pragmatics, speech acts, The Devil Wears Prada

Abstract

This research aims to identify the types of speech acts used by Miranda in The Devil Wears Prada and analyze how these speech acts function to construct and maintain her authority in the workplace. Employing a descriptive qualitative method, the data were collected through repeatedly watching the movie and extracting Miranda’s utterances. The data were analyzed using Miles et al.’s (2014) framework of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing & verification. Searle’s (1975) theory was used to classify speech acts, while Fairclough’s (2013) theory of power guided the interpretation of their roles in workplace power relations. The findings were presented descriptively through selected utterances, their contexts, and their associated power mechanisms. The findings reveal that Miranda utilizes four types of speech acts: directive, assertive, expressive, and commissive, with directives being the most dominant. Directive speech acts are employed by Miranda to control her subordinates’ actions through various mechanisms, such as agenda control, time control, participation control, and boundary reinforcement. Meanwhile, assertive speech acts function to evaluate, shape reality, and influence her subordinates’ perceptions of professionalism. Expressive speech acts exert psychological pressure through criticism, sarcasm, and expression of dissatisfaction, whereas commissive speech acts enforce compliance through implicit threats and professional consequences. This research concludes that speech acts serve as strategic instruments for maintaining workplace authority, power relations, and institutional hierarchy.

 

References

Alsamhori, M. A. O., Seine, M. I., & Al-Zuriqat, Z. K. (2025). “Speech Acts as a Means of Influence and Social Interaction: Perspectives from Austin and Searle.” Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.771

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Chiang, S. (2015). Power and Discourse. In K. Tracy, T. Sandel, & C. Ilie (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (1st ed., pp. 1–17). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi149

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth edition). SAGE.

Drewski, D. (2024). Language and symbolic boundaries among transnational elites: A qualitative case study of European Commission officials. Global Networks, 24(3), e12434. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12434

Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and Power (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250

Hasanova, A. T., Mustafayeva, A. F. Q., Hashimova, R. A., & Nasibova, C. N. (2026). Directive Speech Acts, Social Hierarchy and the Syntax–pragmatics Interface: A Contrastive Study of Azerbaijani and British English Institutional Discourse in Higher Education and Workplace Settings. Journal of Basic and Applied Research International, 32(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.56557/jobari/2026/v32i110310

Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2015). Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. Routledge.

Mammadova, G. (2025). The Power of Language in Social Contexts. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.0250020019

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE.

Oktapiani, Ti., Natsir, M., & Setyowati, R. (2017). WOMEN’S LANGUAGE FEATURES FOUND IN FEMALE CHARACTER’S UTTERANCES IN THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA MOVIE. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 1(3), 220. https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v1i3.672

Permatasari, T. P. (2023). An Analysis of Directive Speech Acts Used by the Antagonist and Protagonist Characters in the Lion King Movie (2019). https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/107487/An-Analysis-of-Directive-Speech-Acts-Used-by-the-Antagonist-and-Protagonist-Characters-in-the-Lion-King-Movie-2019

Probosini, N. (2020). Politeness Strategies in the Main Characters of “The Devil Wears Prada” Movie. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 5(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i1.516

Saifudin, A. (2019). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Linguistik Pragmatik. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v15i1.2382

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1975). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/2b9aa876-a427-4f47-8640-74c20f583c86

Waruwu, M. (2024). Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif: Konsep, Prosedur, Kelebihan dan Peran di Bidang Pendidikan. Afeksi: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 5(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.59698/afeksi.v5i2.236

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

Issue

Section

BASIS VOLUME 13 NO 2 OCTOBER 2026