FRAMING THE LIE: A LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF VIRAL FAKE NEWS DISCOURSE

Authors

  • Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Dea Nita Aulia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Nazwa Atalia Zahra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v12i2.10000

Keywords:

Framing, Fake News, Hoax, Linguistic

Abstract

In the digital era, fake news has become a powerful tool to influence public opinion, spread fear, and manipulate people's behavior. Language plays a significant role in this phenomenon, not only as a means of communication, but also as a tool of persuasion and misdirection. This article examines the linguistic strategies commonly used in the creation and spread of viral hoaxes, using a discourse analysis approach and framing theory. The focus lies on the use of emotional language, manipulative diction, hyperbole, metaphors, as well as narratives designed to establish false credibility and trigger strong emotional reactions. The article also discusses the constructive collaboration between language and visual elements such as images, memes and symbols that reinforce misleading narratives on social media. Data sources consist of 3-5 hoax news stories that have been clarified by fact-checking sites such as TurnBackHoax.id. Data collection was done through documentation techniques by downloading the hoax text and supporting information. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively through content analysis and comparison between the hoax text and its clarification. The findings of this article emphasize the importance of critical awareness of language and media literacy in dealing with disinformation, as well as the need for an interdisciplinary approach involving linguistics, communication, and digital media studies.

References

Bruner, J. (1991). The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daulay, SH., (2019). Language and Society. Medan: Lembaga Peduli Pengembangan Pendidikan Indonesia (LPPPI). ISBN. 978-623-90653-3-1

Daulay, S.H. (2014). Types of code mixing on Facebook status. The 2nd ELITE International Conference, Vol. 38, 365–371.

Daulay, S. H., Bahar, T., Putri, A., & Batubara, P. F. (2023). Various wordings of propaganda on social media: Cases from Instagram application. Journal of Linguistics, Literacy, and Pedagogy, 2(2), 100-107. https://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jllp.v2i2.17800

Daulay, S. H., Nasution, A. H., Ningsih, F. R., Berutu, H., Irham, N. R., & Mahmudah, R. (2024). Code switching in the social media era: A linguistic analysis of Instagram and TikTok users. Humanitatis: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(2), 373-384.

Daulay, S. H., & Lubis, R. A. (2024). Tweeting Between the Lines: Exploring Code Mixing in The Twittersphere. Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching), 12(2), 226-236.

Daulay, S. H., & Aulia, D. N. (2024). Understanding the Role of Language on Twitter: From Hashtag to Discourses. EBONY: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v4i2.12693

Daulay, S. H., Rizky, F. M., & Lubis, R. A. (2025). From Tweets to Tension: How Language Shape Hoaxes and Hatred in the Twitterverse. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 4(2), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.22437/kalistra.v4i2.43702

Ekman, P. (2009). Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.

Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.

Keyes, R. (2004). The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. St. Martin’s Press.

Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lakoff, G. (2004). Do not think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Lutz, B., Adam, M., Feuerriegel, S., Pröllochs, N., & Neumann, D. (2023). Which linguistic cues make people fall for fake news? A comparison of cognitive and affective processing.

McCornack, S. A. (1992). Information Manipulation Theory. Communication Monographs, 59(1), 1–16.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Munusamy, S., Syasyila, K., Shaari, A. A. H., Pitchan, M. A., Kamaluddin, M. R., & Jatnika, R. (2024). Psychological factors contributing to the creation and dissemination of fake news among social media users: a systematic review. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 1-15.

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 1-14.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news stories increases perceived accuracy of stories without warnings. Management Science, 66(11), 4944–4957. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478

Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465

Sari, R., Lubis, A. K., & Daulay, S. H. (2024). Facts and Features of Human Language in Social Media: Interaction and Culture of Alpha Generation. Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature Studies, 4(2), 108-121.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

Ward, S. J. A. (2009). Journalism Ethics. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 295–309). Routledge.

Wiranda, A., Alqawwiy, T. A., & Daulay, S. H. (2024). Identifying Swear Words Uttered by Indonesia Gamer on Live Streaming. JALC: Journal Of Applied Linguistic and Studies of Cultural, 2(2), 1-12.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Issue

Section

BASIS VOLUME 12 NO 2 OCTOBER 2025

Most read articles by the same author(s)