THE CONCEPT OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY IN KANT PHILOSOPHY AND ITS RELEVANCE TO TEACHER PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v13i1.10892Keywords:
Kantian Philosophy, Moral responsibility, Professional EthicsAbstract
This study aims to examine the concept of moral responsibility in the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant and its relevance to teacher professional ethics. Kant’s ethical theory emphasizes that the moral value of an action is determined by intention and adherence to duty rather than consequences. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach using library research. The data sources include Kant’s primary philosophical texts and relevant literature on educational ethics. Data are collected through document analysis and analyzed using interpretative and thematic analysis to identify key ethical principles and their application in teaching practice. The findings show that the categorical imperative encourages teachers to treat students as ends in themselves, promoting fairness, respect, and integrity in classroom interactions. Teachers are positioned as moral agents responsible not only for knowledge transmission but also for students’ character development and dignity. However, challenges such as administrative pressures, curriculum demands, and social changes may hinder the consistent application of Kantian ethics in practice.mIn conclusion, integrating Kant’s moral philosophy into teacher professionalism supports a more humanistic and morally grounded educational environment, while highlighting the need for reflective practice and institutional support.
References
Aloni, N. (2007). Enhancing humanity:
The philosophical foundations of
humanistic education. Springer.
Audi, R. (2015). Moral Perception.
Princeton. University Press.
Biesta, G. (2015). What is education
for? On good education, teacher
judgement, and educational
professionalism. European Journal
of Education, 50(1), 75–87.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11
/ejed.12109
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document
analysis as a qualitative research
method. Qualitative Research
Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33
/QRJ0902027
Campbell, E. (2013). Cultivating moral
and ethical professional practice.
Teaching and Teacher Education,
(1), 29–38.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10
/j.tate.2012.04.004
Carr, D. (2005). Personal values and
professional ethics. ,. Journal of
Applied Philosophy, 22(2), 143–
Colnerud, G. (2015). Moral stress in
teaching practice. Teachers and
Teaching, 21(3), 346–360.
| P a g e
No. 1 April 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10
/13540602.2014.953817
Elizabeth Campbell, E. (2008). The
ethics of teaching as a moral
profession. Curriculum Inquiry,
(4), 357–385.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11
/j.1467-873X.2008.00414.x
Gert Biesta, G. (2010). Good education
in an age of measurement: Ethics,
politics, democracy. Routledge.
Hansen, D. T. (2021). The teacher and
the world: A study of
cosmopolitanism as education. In
Routledge.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012).
Professional capital: Transforming
teaching in every school. In
Teachers College Press.
Husu, J., & Tirri, K. (2023). Teachers’
professional ethics and moral
competence. Educational Research
Review, 38, 100-504.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10
/j.edurev.2022.100504
John Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and
education. In Macmillan.
Kant, I. (1996). Groundwork of the
Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor,
Trans.). In Cambridge University
Press.
Kant, I. (2002). Critique of Practical
Reason (T. K. Abbott, Trans.). In
Hackett Publishing.
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the
kingdom of ends. Cambridge
University Press.
Maxwell, B., Tremblay-Laprise, A. A.,
Filion, M., et al. (2016). A fivecountry survey on ethics education
in teacher education. Journal of
Teacher Education, 67(2), 135–
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11
/0022487115624490
Michael W. Apple, M. W. (2013). Can
education change society?
Routledge.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.43
/9780203114930
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A
relational approach to ethics and
moral education (2nd ed.). In
University of California Press.
O’Neill, O. (2013). Acting on principle:
An essay on Kantian ethics.
Cambridge University Press.
Pring, R. (2022). Education, moral
responsibility and the teacher.
Bloomsbury.
Santoro, D. A. (2018). Demoralized:
Why teachers leave the profession
they love and how they can stay.
Harvard Education Press.
Siregar, E., et al. (2022). Teacher
professionalism in Indonesia:
Challenges and reforms. Jurnal
Pendidikan, 23(2), 145–158.
Sockett, H. (1993). The moral base for
teacher professionalism. Teachers
College Press.
Strike, K. A., & Soltis, J. F. (2009). The
ethics of teaching (5th ed.). In
Teachers College Press.
Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2013). Menjadi
guru profesional: Strategi
meningkatkan kualifikasi dan
kualitas guru di era global. In
Erlangga.
Warnick, B. R., & Silverman, S. K.
(2011). A framework for
professional ethics courses in
teacher education. Journal of
Teacher Education, 62(3), 273–
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11
/0022487110398002
Woodward, K. (n.d.). Understanding
identity.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.43
/9781003001201








JURNAL BASIS (BAHASA DAN SASTRA INGGRIS)