THE CONCEPT OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY IN KANT PHILOSOPHY AND ITS RELEVANCE TO TEACHER PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

Penulis

  • Afni Rosalina Universitas Deztron Indonesia
  • M Manugeren Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Efendi Barus Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v13i1.10892

Kata Kunci:

Kantian Philosophy, Moral responsibility, Professional Ethics

Abstrak

This study aims to examine the concept of moral responsibility in the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant and its relevance to teacher professional ethics. Kant’s ethical theory emphasizes that the moral value of an action is determined by intention and adherence to duty rather than consequences. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach using library research. The data sources include Kant’s primary philosophical texts and relevant literature on educational ethics. Data are collected through document analysis and analyzed using interpretative and thematic analysis to identify key ethical principles and their application in teaching practice. The findings show that the categorical imperative encourages teachers to treat students as ends in themselves, promoting fairness, respect, and integrity in classroom interactions. Teachers are positioned as moral agents responsible not only for knowledge transmission but also for students’ character development and dignity. However, challenges such as administrative pressures, curriculum demands, and social changes may hinder the consistent application of Kantian ethics in practice.mIn conclusion, integrating Kant’s moral philosophy into teacher professionalism supports a more humanistic and morally grounded educational environment, while highlighting the need for reflective practice and institutional support.

Referensi

Aloni, N. (2007). Enhancing humanity:

The philosophical foundations of

humanistic education. Springer.

Audi, R. (2015). Moral Perception.

Princeton. University Press.

Biesta, G. (2015). What is education

for? On good education, teacher

judgement, and educational

professionalism. European Journal

of Education, 50(1), 75–87.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11

/ejed.12109

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document

analysis as a qualitative research

method. Qualitative Research

Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33

/QRJ0902027

Campbell, E. (2013). Cultivating moral

and ethical professional practice.

Teaching and Teacher Education,

(1), 29–38.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10

/j.tate.2012.04.004

Carr, D. (2005). Personal values and

professional ethics. ,. Journal of

Applied Philosophy, 22(2), 143–

Colnerud, G. (2015). Moral stress in

teaching practice. Teachers and

Teaching, 21(3), 346–360.

| P a g e

No. 1 April 2026

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10

/13540602.2014.953817

Elizabeth Campbell, E. (2008). The

ethics of teaching as a moral

profession. Curriculum Inquiry,

(4), 357–385.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11

/j.1467-873X.2008.00414.x

Gert Biesta, G. (2010). Good education

in an age of measurement: Ethics,

politics, democracy. Routledge.

Hansen, D. T. (2021). The teacher and

the world: A study of

cosmopolitanism as education. In

Routledge.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012).

Professional capital: Transforming

teaching in every school. In

Teachers College Press.

Husu, J., & Tirri, K. (2023). Teachers’

professional ethics and moral

competence. Educational Research

Review, 38, 100-504.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10

/j.edurev.2022.100504

John Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and

education. In Macmillan.

Kant, I. (1996). Groundwork of the

Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor,

Trans.). In Cambridge University

Press.

Kant, I. (2002). Critique of Practical

Reason (T. K. Abbott, Trans.). In

Hackett Publishing.

Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the

kingdom of ends. Cambridge

University Press.

Maxwell, B., Tremblay-Laprise, A. A.,

Filion, M., et al. (2016). A fivecountry survey on ethics education

in teacher education. Journal of

Teacher Education, 67(2), 135–

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11

/0022487115624490

Michael W. Apple, M. W. (2013). Can

education change society?

Routledge.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.43

/9780203114930

Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A

relational approach to ethics and

moral education (2nd ed.). In

University of California Press.

O’Neill, O. (2013). Acting on principle:

An essay on Kantian ethics.

Cambridge University Press.

Pring, R. (2022). Education, moral

responsibility and the teacher.

Bloomsbury.

Santoro, D. A. (2018). Demoralized:

Why teachers leave the profession

they love and how they can stay.

Harvard Education Press.

Siregar, E., et al. (2022). Teacher

professionalism in Indonesia:

Challenges and reforms. Jurnal

Pendidikan, 23(2), 145–158.

Sockett, H. (1993). The moral base for

teacher professionalism. Teachers

College Press.

Strike, K. A., & Soltis, J. F. (2009). The

ethics of teaching (5th ed.). In

Teachers College Press.

Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2013). Menjadi

guru profesional: Strategi

meningkatkan kualifikasi dan

kualitas guru di era global. In

Erlangga.

Warnick, B. R., & Silverman, S. K.

(2011). A framework for

professional ethics courses in

teacher education. Journal of

Teacher Education, 62(3), 273–

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11

/0022487110398002

Woodward, K. (n.d.). Understanding

identity.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.43

/9781003001201

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2026-04-30

Terbitan

Bagian

BASIS VOLUME 13 NO 1 APRIL 2026

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama